Skip to main content

Understanding Adrenaline Dosage

Have you ever administered adrenaline for anaphylactic shock? I've never had the unfortunate need to. I'm sure anyone who ever does will forever remember the correct dosage. But for me, it is always a confusion. Every time I vaccinate someone at my clinic, I look up the dose of adrenaline just to be sure.

The first problem is the dilutions. Dosages of adrenaline are (or were) mentioned in dilution. 1:1000 & 1:10000. There begins the confusion.

Firstly, let us understand where the 1000 comes from in 1:1000. Have you seen a small vial of adrenaline? That is 1mL. It has effectively 1mg of epinephrine/adrenaline. But why is it called 1:1000? Because 1mL of water = 1g of water = 1000mg. So, the 1:1000 actually refers to 1mg of adrenaline : 1000 mg of water. Unnecessarily complex!

All you had to say was 1mg in 1mL. And that is why this labeling is now being followed in some countries.

So, there you have a small vial - a 1mL vial - with 1mg of adrenaline in it.

Now, let us look at the other form epinephrine comes in. Epinephrine also comes in a big syringe of 10mL. But even this 10mL contains only 1 mg of adrenaline. The total amount of adrenaline in this 10mL form is the same as a small vial.

What is different then? Well, when the volume increases without increase in amount, the concentration drops. The 10mL form is more dilute than the small vial. Can you guess the dilution? It is 1:10000 or more easily expressed as 1mg in 10mL.

So, the first thing to internalize is that the small 1mL vial we see has 1mg of adrenaline (it may say 1.8mg of an adrenaline salt, but the effective amount of adrenaline is 1mg). And this is a concentrated form of adrenaline.

What that also means is that the 1mg/1mL adrenaline is never used directly IV! The reason is that this can cause an arrhythmia or other damages to the heart muscles.

If you're bored reading text, watch this youtube video telling these same things.

Now, the dilute form and the concentrated form are for slightly different uses. The concentrated form is given IM in anaphylactic shock. The dilute form is given IV in cardiac arrest.

When giving IM adrenaline for anaphylactic shock, the dosage in adults is almost always 0.5mg (0.5mL of the concentrated vial). If you can remember this fact it is easy to calculate the pediatric dose as well. The adult dose can be thought of as if it applies to a 50kg person. So 0.5mg for 50kg = 0.01mg/kg and that is the pediatric dose. (This 50kg adult approximation applies for many other drugs in calculation of pediatric dose. Let me know in comments below about other drugs that can be calculated this way).

When giving in cardiac arrest, in which case the dilute form (1mg in 10mL) is used, the adult dose is the entire 1mg (or 10mL) given intravenous and repeated based on the protocol you follow.

That is all there is to know. Just a 0.5mg and a 1mg.


MaaLuSreya said…
Really awesome explanation by you @Akshay S Dinesh...but 1 more reason for administration of 0.5ml adrenaline IM is due to its ease to administer without wasting time over securing an IV line and putting the patient's life in danger.
MaaLuSreya said…

Popular posts from this blog

What to Make of Itolizumab?

It is the worst of times. Science is suffering an identity crisis. The world is in dire need of science. Science isn't used to being rushed. "It is a giant and slow churn", said a friend once, "and spews a breakthrough once in a while". Is it possible to make the process faster? That's what everyone is wondering. And praying. And waiting, eagerly. Science isn't used to getting this attention.
"Coronil is 100% effective", said Patanjali folks. "Favipiravir is 88% effective", said Glenmark folks. How to know the truth? Seeking truth has never been easy. Never has it been easy for journalists, scientists, or the common person. In some sciences there are multiple truths. Is medicine one of those sciences? Can there be a single truth in medicine?
I won't use words like epistemology and ontology in this post. (Because I still can't remember which is which). But the question is essentially two:
1. Is there a single truth? 2. Is there a…

Public Health Was Always Broken, You Are Just Noticing It Now

There is this nytimes article about how one pregnant lady who was also breathless couldn't find appropriate care despite going to multiple hospitals. I find it nothing surprising. Our country's public health system has never been able to provide appropriate care to people with medical emergencies (or for that matter, any health issue). Maybe now people are noticing because it comes on news.
There is a limit to how many emergencies can be handled at a time by a small medical team. Even in tertiary care government hospitals, this "team" is a very small one. It usually includes a couple of young doctors - either doing their internship or their residency. And a couple of nurses. And a couple of janitors. It is the same whether you are talking about the ICU or the emergency room of any department. There are no mechanisms for requesting extra hands when there is a spike in cases at any moment. Crises are handled by expediting care (many a times at the expense of quality and…

Glenmark Lies About Favipiravir

I received from a friend a PDF which happened to be Glenmark's press release about Favipiravir. The release is full of claims that make it sound like Favipiravir is a wonder drug that is going to solve COVID problems. It becomes my responsibility to refute some of these claims, considering how majority media outlets are doing what they're best at - exaggerating an already exaggerated PR claim.
Firstly, we have to verify the claim whether India's drug controller did approve the drug. The way to do that is visit CDSCO's website and navigate to approvals -> new drugs. And as per that, "Favipiravir bulk and Favipiravir film coated tablet 200mg" did in fact receive approval on 19th of June for "the treatment of patients with mild to moderate Covid-19 disease" as the 18th entry.
I do not think CDSCO publishes details of the approval process, about what evidence they considered for approval, etc. Making these processes transparent would be useful for avoi…