It's been a long time since I posted any question papers on this blog :D I've been doing a distance course in medical law & ethics from National Law School Bangalore. I love the course. So much so that I didn't take exam the first time so I could extent the duration. This time I had to take at least two papers. (I'm taking four, and skipping dissertation for next time). This is paper 1 which is common to all diploma courses (among child rights, cyber law, and so on). I've ticked the questions I answered.
If you do not avoid news like me, you would have heard about the tragic death of a 10 year old in Wayanad a couple of days ago. You can search the name and find the story on your own, but a few facts are established already.
Shehla Sherin had her foot go into a hole on the floor of her classroom and was afraid a snake bit her in that incidentThere was delay in taking her to the hospitalAnti-Snake venom was not administered at the local hospital, and the child was referred to a tertiary care center at least an hour away.Child died on the way.
I won't unnecessarily go into speculations on what other things happened on that fateful day, but having managed emergency department in a rural hospital for over an year, I will use this sad death to illustrate two very important lessons for every doctor.
Lesson 1: Never take any complaint lightly, even if the circumstances lead you to think otherwise
There are two ways patients can come in. There are people who exaggerate, and people who down…
Have you ever administered adrenaline for anaphylactic shock? I've never had the unfortunate need to. I'm sure anyone who ever does will forever remember the correct dosage. But for me, it is always a confusion. Every time I vaccinate someone at my clinic, I look up the dose of adrenaline just to be sure.
The first problem is the dilutions. Dosages of adrenaline are (or were) mentioned in dilution. 1:1000 & 1:10000. There begins the confusion.
Firstly, let us understand where the 1000 comes from in 1:1000. Have you seen a small vial of adrenaline? That is 1mL. It has effectively 1mg of epinephrine/adrenaline. But why is it called 1:1000? Because 1mL of water = 1g of water = 1000mg. So, the 1:1000 actually refers to 1mg of adrenaline : 1000 mg of water. Unnecessarily complex!
All you had to say was 1mg in 1mL. And that is why this labeling is now being followed in some countries.
So, there you have a small vial - a 1mL vial - with 1mg of adrenaline in it.
Today as I was returning home in metro two lawyers occupied the seats next to mine. I was reading A Reader on Reading by Alberto Manguel. But I distinctly heard one of them tell the other "I have two cases tomorrow evening". That set me thinking.
Advocates have "cases" and so do doctors. Advocates have "clients" and so do doctors. (Some doctors call their clients patients because some clients are indeed patients. But some doctors call even their patients clients, appreciating the fact that ultimately the people who come to them are dignified individuals seeking a service and with autonomy in choosing service providers.)
Advocates are also notorious for charging sometimes lakhs for an "appearance". But here doctors have itt slightly different. Doctors also get called money-minded and unscrupulous, but they get called so for charging much less than what advocates usually charge. Why is this so?
I came up with various possible reasons. One, the hu…
There are good journalists and bad journalists. It is the reader's duty to discern between what is right and what is wrong. The problem in the 21st century is that that duty is completely thrown into water under the guise of "forwarded as received".
There are a lot of articles in newspapers talking about dropping the world "healthcare" from the list of services under the consumer protection act of 2019. Many of them have fancy headlines suggesting that healthcare will not be a service that falls under the ambit of the new consumer protection act. At least some of them have written objectively stating where the word is dropped from without going into judgement on what this means.
But many doctors are reading headlines and thinking that the consumer protection act will not apply to healthcare henceforth. What they need to read to know they are wrong is just one judgement by the Supreme Court in the "Indian Medical Association vs VP Shantha, 1995" case.
I was recently asked by someone whether Meftal-Forte is a better drug than Meftal-Spas for menstrual pain.
I hadn't heard about Meftal-Forte till then. So I looked up. 1mg told me both the drugs are manufactured by Blue Cross.
The page about Meftal-Spas gives us what I knew already - it is a combination of Mefenamic Acid 250mg and Dicyclomine 10mg.
The page about Meftal-Forte told me that it is a combination of Mefenamic Acid 500mg and Paracetamol 325 mg.
Based on this, the quick answer is "No. Meftal-Spas seems to be better suited for menstrual pain in people who find relief by using it. But self-medication may not be the best way to manage menstrual pain."
The longer answer is that dicyclomine is an anti-spasmodic that is widely used with anecdotal evidence supporting its use in primary dysmenorrhea. Mefenamic acid is an anti-inflammatory drug that is indicated for use in primary dysmenorrhea. Paracetamol is not really indicated for primary dysmenorrhea. Therefore if f…
Last week, an interesting question was raised in our primary care fellowship ECHO session. "Can you give consultation to a minor without the guardian's consent?" A simple scenario could be when a 15 year old girl comes to your clinic alone, anxious, and asks for a consult. Would you proceed normally? Would you ask her to call her parents and come back? What would you do?
During the session I quickly searched and found an article in Indian Pediatrics, which said that "A child between 12-18 years can give consent only for medical examination but not for any procedure". But then, I went back to see on what legal basis this was said. They seem to have referred Legal Aspects of Medical Care, a book by RK Sharma. I unfortunately do not have this book to figure out which source in law RK Sharma has used.
So I started searching more. In National Medical Journal of India, Karunakaran Mathiharan goes through various clauses of multiple statutes and state that there is a …
Dr Payal Tadvi committed suicide exactly a week ago. She was a postgraduate student in Obstetrics & Gynecology. Investigation is going on about the death. There are quotes from family members that she was being harassed on the basis of caste by seniors. Those seniors have written their side blaming workload. (Please go through the links if you do not know the details)
Let us leave them aside and ask ourselves a few questions now.
Is their discrimination in medical colleges?
There is. All kinds of it. Economic capacity. Skin tone. Age. Seniority. Language. Region. Residence in the state where the medical college is in. Category of seat. Every damn kind of discrimination. There is discrimination in medical colleges.
Is their caste-based discrimination in medical colleges?
I think the answer is yes. I haven't seen much first hand. But, there is definitely discrimination based on reservation. And since reservation is based on caste, it can indirectly be told that this is caste-base…
My comment: In our work with transgender men and women and other gender minorities, this was the common opinion among all "categories" of people - to stop categorizing them.
Here is another illustration. HIV prevention and control efforts in India has a certain stress on prevention among high risk groups. For many people in the field, "LGBTQ" is a high risk group. If you look at it, the only thing common among the members of this "category" is that they are all gender minorities. By using the term "LGBTQ" many lesbians and transgender men who are actually "low risk groups" get mischaracterized as people with risk of HIV and gets repeatedly asked to do HIV testing.
The people we talk to have all been affected by the medical system's lack of ability to deal with the full spectrum of gender. They strongly ask for developing a framework for healthcare pro…
When I hear "Artificial Intelligence" and "Healthcare" together in a sentence, it is usually never a pleasant thing I'm listening to. There almost always is some kind of reinvention of wheel where Google's hardware cycles are spent in trying to solve something meaningless.
For example, it is futile to differentiate between tuberculosis and cancer from an image of the chest where the answer may never lie in the image, but rather in the symptoms of the patient. Even if AI tells the physician that the ECG it is reading is normal (which the physician probably noticed on their own), the physician still has many reasons to refer the patient to a higher center.
These are isolated examples. But it is the isolation that makes these good examples. AI's role is not in isolation. AI's role is in integration. AI (or computers) should come in and fill in where humans struggle - processing large amounts of data. (Processing data, not for the sake of figuring out p…
Sunil K Pandya asked on NMJI "Are Libraries in Our Medical Institutes Dead?" Badakere Rao responded to it with his memories of physical books.
I had this response:
The article on libraries and your response to it was a sweet read
to me. The school in Mattanur that I studied from 1st standard till 10th
standard had a large library (when I went back last month, it felt
small. Maybe everything was much bigger when we were smaller). If my
memory serves me right it had 4000+ books. The most beautiful thing was
that when any student has a birthday they would celebrate it by donating
a book (or more books) to the library and their names would be
announced in the school assembly. This kept the number of books keep
increasing. Perhaps it became a prestige issue for parents to send only
quality books with their kids for their birthday, because all the books
so donated were usually good and new books. From as far as I remember my
favorite pastime after school (and free hours…
The other day I saw an impassioned plea from a doctor asking associations to "regulate the profession". The reason they cited was that healthcare is turning commercial and often this goes against the best interest of the patient.
One of the many things I learned in National Law School listening to Prof Nandimath and others is that "regulations" come with their own set of problems.
Let us look at it more closely.
First, what is the problem we are trying to solve? The healthcare system in our country (many other countries too, perhaps) have huge flaws in it that lead to suffering and poor quality of care for the end user (the patient). Medical training is focused on the wrong parameters (recent change of UG curriculum to a competency based curriculum is proof of this). Distribution of healthcare providers is disproportionately concentrated in urban areas. Healthcare is episodic. Government policies are weakening public health system. (Public health system, even o…
Many doctors have very little time to spend with the patient. So little time that sometimes they start writing prescription before even arriving at a provisional diagnosis. Imagine how then, would they explain to their patient why they have written a particular tablet for them?
Is there a product/service idea in this vacuum of counseling that should have been provided by the doctor? Are there people who are not able to ask the right questions to the internet to find the answers?
Perhaps there should be an app that is front-end for a prescription description service. The user uploads their prescription and also attaches a short voice note with their symptoms. This goes to a doctor/nurse/pharmacologist/pharmacist at the back-end who responds by reading out the prescription and counseling the patient about what the medication is, what it does, what side effects can be expected, etc.
The counseling of each medicine can be recorded and reused for the next patient who is prescribed the same…
Forwarding a message I received from Dr Dharav Shah who is creating a wave of change in youngsters across India making them abstaining from the first puff and the first drink so they lead a healthy and happy life without the poisons we love. Do watch the video. I had tears only once, but your mileage may vary. ----------------------------- Dear friends, Last week i had forwarded TEDx talk of Dr Taru, who had worked in a district hospital of Bihar. The NGO with which she was working, needs doctors for similar work in district hospitals in Bihar. If you know any surgeon, Gynecologist, pediatrician or Anaesthetist who would probably like to take up this challenge for 6 months or more, please inform them about this opportunity to contribute. Please forward this ad in your medico groups Are you upto the challenge of being an agent of change, working towards improving Emergency services in a progressive Bihar? Positions: 1. WHO-CARE Global Surgery fellowship - *Specialist Obstetrician*: 2. WHO-CAR…
Link to original article: http://ijmedph.org/article/217 This is a very thought provoking article I came across yesterday. It says that the actual role of a community medicine specialist is as a family doctor in primary health centres. My college had a "preventive and social medicine" department. Now it all makes sense. If you look at community medicine departments in the present situation you see that they restrict themselves to TB, HIV, Leprosy, or whatever diseases have a national program on them. No national program? Out of scope of community medicine. And even within these, the role that community medicine department likes to play is that of a CME organizer. I do not remember a case discussion in community medicine in my college days where the patient was actually in front. What community medicine needs is a practice base. Read the article here: http://ijmedph.org/article/217
This is an idea I've been having since a long time. I think it is relatively easy to implement as well. We need textbooks like we have online maps. Textbooks that give you an overview first and then let you zoom in to any part and get more and more details. The deeper we go and the more details we have the harder will the level of complexity be. So, a beginner can probably zoom out and get a large overview of all the topics they need. Someone who already has the overview can zoom in at a part and get some more details. Then, they can zoom in again and get more details, and again, and again till they reach the maximum available information. Writing such a textbook may seem complicated but all it takes is some amount of reorganization of thoughts and marking sentences by their level of complexity.